Scotland

Dsc 0178 A

Interfaith Reception

Dsc 0175In late November, the committee welcomed representatives of many faith communities to our annual Faith Reception in the Archdiocesan offices in Glasgow.

The committee were delighted to welcome as a special guest, Lord Provost Jacqueline McLaren, and keynote speaker and Parliamentary Officer for the Catholic Church at Holyrood, Mr. Anthony Horan.

The reception was the committee’s formal contribution to the many activities that had taken place across the country as part of Scottish Interfaith Week.

This year, the reception was preceded by a guided tour of the cathedral led by archdiocesan archivist Mary McLure. The story of the cathedral’s many interesting features, the art, mosaics, windows, statues and decoration is a truly fascinating one and our guests thoroughly enjoyed the tour.

Around fifty guests and members of the committee were welcomed by Bishop McGee, President of the Interreligious Dialogue Committee, in the Eyre Hall to listen to Anthony Horan’s reflections on the challenges that people of faith can experience but opportunities that interreligious dialogue offers when facing up to the challenges of the modern world.

He spoke of how all people of faith in Scotland, including Catholics, can be singled out for abuse and discrimination simply because they have a faith. However, he also pointed out that there are places elsewhere in the world where oppression on the basis of faith can be far more serious and violations of basic rights stemming from religious bigotry can result in people losing their lives.

He praised the work done by people of all faiths and interfaith organisations in tackling prejudice and discrimination. He praised the leadership of the representatives present and their work for the most poor and vulnerable in society.

In his talk he also reflected on the issues facing our society today and explored both the opportunities for collaboration on core concerns such as poverty, homelessness, but also the challenges that we face when dealing with complex moral issues such as the current moves to allow people to end their lives at a time of their choosing.

You can find the full text of his talk here.

Following the talk there was the usual get together over food and the spirit of friendship was evident throughout the room in the laughter and conversations people shared.

Dsc 0169

Interfaith Reception Read More »

Stronger Together

Stronger Together

Talk given by Anthony Horan, 2024 interfaith Reception, November

Dsc 0182 Lord/Lady Provost, Bishop Brian, faith leaders and friends, it is a pleasure to be with you here this evening at this annual interfaith reception.

A long, long time ago, when I was just a young lad, I think maybe 13 or 14 years old, I was playing golf at my local club. I had only just joined the club; my parents thought it would be a good idea as I was showing signs of promise at the game. It was my first proper outing with the other members of the club.

So, I went out and I am afraid to report that I played badly. It was awful and I ended up finishing last. If you Google the word ‘abysmal’ you will find a little summary of my performance that day at the top of the search items.

Now that was bad enough, but something else quite specific happened that day; and it has stayed with me ever since. A single moment that put me on edge, on guard.

I was desperately trying to make a good connection with the ball on one of the fairways (actually it was in the rough, I always ended up in the rough!) as another group of players were about to tee off from an adjacent tee. I mishit the ball a couple of times and at one point I looked up to see the other group of players having a bit of a giggle, as you would. Perfectly understandable given my comical efforts.

But, in a bit of a fluster and to try and make a joke out of the situation, and in my naivety, I then proceeded to cross myself as if to call on a higher power to help dig me out of my dire sporting predicament.

Now I think it is safe to say that the mood turned rather sour.

I had gone from an unthreatening, benign, figure of fun, to the enemy. And so, they hurled abuse, including the ubiquitous cry of “fenian b”, and, I think it’s safe to say that I was on edge for the remaining 15 holes of my round as a result of this incident.

In the grand scheme of things this is not a particularly serious event. I emerged unharmed, just a little psychologically bruised and with a fresh new awareness of bigotry and intolerance and the reality that I too could be the subject of it.

This little episode unearthed a sinister undertone of intolerance, discrimination and abuse when it comes to religion. And whilst the situation has undoubtedly improved over the years it still exists to some degree.

And, of course, it isn’t just Catholics who are on the wrong end of it. Other Christians, Muslims, Baha’i, Jews, Sikhs, Hindus and many, many more can be on the receiving end of abuse, and worse, simply because of their faith.

This is especially the case in other parts of the world where people are abused, some are oppressed, some are violated, some are even killed for their faith.

Here in the UK it is, on the whole, not too serious, but people can still be subjected to awful intolerance and discrimination on the basis of their faith. And sometimes it can get more serious.

But we know that this isn’t the way it ought to be. That is not how we in our faith communities are called to live out our lives. And we know there is a different path. A path which seeks a peaceful existence among those who may hold differing views, including differing views on the big important questions about life.

And I think that all of us gathered here tonight would agree that this peaceful way of life is something that we ought to aim for and, in many ways, it is something that we do experience to a large extent here in Scotland.

Now, wouldn’t it be lovely if I stood here and said that everything was rosy and that our various faith communities agreed on everything, and we all get along fabulously well all of the time.

Well, I think it’s fair to say that we do get along fairly well, most of the time.

But, as is often the case, there are challenging issues; ones that we will not agree on, that will highlight significant differences of opinion; elephants in the room if you like. And we ought to recognise these; we shouldn’t shy away from recognising them and addressing them.

Now, there are issues that are less contentious, I would say, like poverty, homelessness, and the importance of human dignity that we can all pretty much agree on.

But there are other issues which can highlight significant disagreement between faith communities and even within some faith communities.

For example, assisted suicide, or assisted dying (the terminology is very much dependent on your view). A highly emotive, sensitive, and fundamentally important topic that attracts plenty of robust debate and considerable disagreement. And this is one of those issues which causes disagreement within some faith communities too.

The issue of gender identity is perhaps another. Much disagreement on a deeply personal and sensitive issue.

And that’s just a couple of examples.

So, the picture isn’t one of unalloyed warmth and cosiness.

We don’t agree on everything. We have different perspectives on key issues, sometimes very different perspectives.

The tragic situation in the middle east comes all to easily and all to sadly to mind. The situation there is significant for all of us but more so for our Jewish and Muslim brothers and sisters. There will be differences of opinion on the social and political approaches to dealing with the conflict. There is justifiably a lot of emotion involved. And, as a result, there may be very strong, very strong, and robust disagreement. And that is fair. Because it is a very serious matter; a matter of life and death, sadly, far too much death, too many lives ruined, futures destroyed, no hope.

So, it is an issue that can evoke much disagreement, between nations, between cultures, between religions, and between individuals.

But despite disagreement and difference, here we are. Together.

Gathered together, talking together, breaking bread together. We are here, together.

And that is massively important.

Despite disagreement, we can be together. And we can talk, we can discuss, we can debate.

And that’s what we need more of in society, at every level in society.

Sadly, the effect of social media means that much of our social debate nowadays is played out online. Not face-to-face. And this can result in shaming, abuse, even threats of violence. All too easy to do from the comfort of sitting behind a screen without having to face the reality of one’s actions.

And all too often those perpetrating this are people who ought to know better. It’s not just young people as I am sure you know. There are adults too. And sometimes politicians. Far too often I have witnessed politicians bating one another in ways unbecoming of their office.

But thankfully I look around me this evening and I see people who refuse to get drawn into tit-for-tat online squabbles or who will engage in intolerance, discrimination, or abuse.

I see leadership. True leadership. Good leadership. I don’t know you all personally, some I know better than others, but I am absolutely confident that you are all people who want to secure peace and help those in need, most especially the poor and vulnerable.

And that is why it is so important for you to continue to be a good and positive example in your communities and to encourage others to do the same.

Let’s take the issue of poverty, in particular massive issues around homelessness in Scotland and a housing crisis which means many families, including many children have no permanent home here in Scotland. And this includes many people who have fled dangers in their homeland.

My parish priest recently told the story of his driving down to the church one day and seeing parishioners packing all sorts of stuff into the back of a car. Food, clothing, bedding, and all manner of bits and bobs. He went over to enquire what was going on and was told that an Afghan family had recently come to the town with nothing but the clothing on their backs and the local community were providing them with the basic necessities to get by. The dad in the family had been shot in the face in Afghanistan and the family had to flee for their lives. It’s a tragic story and one that is all-too-common, I fear.

But, despite their tragic circumstances and the fear they must have felt and having to leave their home, this family are probably quite fortunate. They are alive, they have managed to reach safety here in Scotland, and the local community is taking care of them. The local food bank has stepped up, the clothing bank stepped up, and parishioners have even approached the priest and thrust cash into his hand urging him to use it to help the family.

This story does not stand on its own. It is one of many.

And whilst on one hand this story is a sad one, it is also a heartwarming and hopeful one.

And I know that these little stories of love and hope are happening across Scotland, most especially in your communities. Because of you and the people you lead and support; the faith communities of Scotland are doing wonderful things.

So often we hear of vulnerable people, including many who are new to the country, approaching faith communities for help.

It is no accident that our communities are focal points for people in need. Historically you, and those who have gone before you, have been on hand to provide a warm place to rest, a hot meal and other food provisions, essential winter clothing, toiletries, nappies, prams, school uniforms, and general support and advice, and love. And that’s just a few of the things that you and your communities do to help those in need.

These desperate people need a focal point, and that is your communities.

If I may just close off with some personal experiences of working with faith communities in my own day-to-day work in the Catholic Parliamentary Office, (where I have been in post since 2016).

As you know, both the UK and Scottish Parliaments are currently considering proposals to legalise assisted dying, or assisted suicide. Now I know that there will most likely be different views on this issue in this room. Some faith communities are in favour, some are opposed, and there is also internal disagreement within some faith communities about whether or not it is the right thing to do.

It’s a particularly sensitive and emotive issue and one which needs to be handled carefully. I think that is one of the issues I have with the Bill in Westminster. Notwithstanding my own personal opposition to the principle of what is being proposed, I do not think that the time afforded to scrutinise Kim Leadbeater’s Bill (it was published just two weeks ago tonight) ahead of the vote on Friday is anywhere near sufficient. And, of course, it will only be a five-hour debate on Friday before MPs are asked to vote on it.

If you think about Brexit, which was a very significant constitutional matter; hours, days, weeks, months, even years were spent scrutinising the proposal to leave the EU.

And the issue of assisted dying is surely no less important. It’s literally a matter of life and death and ought to be subjected to the highest degree of scrutiny before parliamentarians are asked to vote on it.

But I am pleased to say that, in terms of both the Holyrood and Westminster proposals on assisted dying, I have worked closely with those faith communities who are opposed, including other Christian communities and the Muslim community, and we have effectively shared resources and knowledge to work on this issue.

We even held a joint event in the Scottish Parliament earlier this year, bringing together the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, an Imam from Dundee, and Bishop John Keenan of Paisley, to sign a declaration opposing assisted suicide.

And I have witnessed some excellent collaborative engagement between faith communities on issues around tackling child poverty, including a successful call for an increase to the Scottish Child Payment, and also calling on the Scottish Government to give social care workers fair pay.

Another example of working with faith communities came a few years ago with the Scottish Government’s Hate Crime and Public Order Act. You may recall that there was quite the hoo-ha about this legislation, in particular the potential to restrict free speech and free expression, including a vociferous challenge from the entertainment industry, specifically comedians, who were worried that their edgy routines may no longer be welcome in Scotland.

In terms of the religious angle, there was a fair amount that was noble about the legislation, but there were also some aspects of concern, including a broad and, in my view, ill-defined clause on inflammatory material which we in the Catholic community were worried might censor some of our teachings on beginning of life and human sexuality and marriage, for example.

In the end this clause was removed.

But during the many discussions and negotiations that were had between stakeholders, my own Church included, and government ministers and civil servants, we discovered all sorts of atypical alliances. At one point, in relation to one specific aspect of the legislative proposal, we, the Catholic Church and other Christian churches, were at one with the Humanists of Scotland. A most unlikely alliance I am sure you will agree. But there you have it; with God all things are possible!

And so, I think that is the tone on which I would like to draw a close to my little reflection this evening.

We have many differences, and we are mature enough to acknowledge these. But these differences do not prevent us from working together where there is common ground. And these differences cannot make us indifferent to one other and preclude the potential for working together.

Last year, during her reflection in this very room, Sister Isabel spoke about “going forth” as collaborators on a vast project to make the world a better place for everyone. The work of that project continues.

I recall that it was not too long ago that some of us sat around the same table with the First Minister as violence erupted in other parts of the UK. We all had one aim in mind at that gathering: to work together to maintain peace. Together. (that word again)

May we all continue to work hard and maintain a laser-sharp focus on peace and helping the most vulnerable across all communities in Scotland.

And your continued leadership is key to sustaining that peace.

We are a stronger, more effective, force for good, when we are together.

Thank you.

Stronger Together Read More »

Conference 1

Human Fraternity Conference in Glasgow

Dr Duncan MacLaren

Over 100 people from the Shia and Catholic communities with other invited guests attended this event organised by the Scottish Catholic Bishops’ Committee for Interreligious Dialogue and the Ahl Al-Beit Society- Scotland in Glasgow’s City Chambers on 7th February.

The purpose of the conference was to celebrate Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together, the document signed by Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmed Al-Tayeb, in Abu Dhabi in 2019. The United Nations celebrates the document on 4th February every year as the International Day of Human Fraternity to promote “cultural and religious tolerance, understanding and dialogue”.

16906 Uae Human Fraternity 600 384
Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Cairo’s Al-Azhar Sheikh Ahmad al-Tayeb signed the 'Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together' on February 4th in Abu Dhabi. [Photo courtesy of the UAE Embassy in Lebanon]
Every year, the Bishops’ Interreligious Committee and the Shia Ahl Al-Beit Society organise a conference to help publicise the document, urge people of faith to study its contents and help bring the document alive in the public domain.

The two main speakers were Sheikh Dr Mohammad Ali Shomali, a distinguished Muslim scholar, academic, philosopher and theologian who has spoken on interfaith issues in many countries over the last twenty-five years and Bishop Brian McGee, Bishop of Argyll and the Isles and President of the Scottish Bishops’ Committee for Interreligious Dialogue. They both tackled the document’s challenges and possibilities for us in the contemporary world.

Conference 3
Joseph Sikora, Secretary of the Bishops' Committee, with Keynote Speakers Dr. Shomali and Bishop McGee alongside Azzam Mohamad of Ahl Al Bait - Scotland

Sheikh Shomali reminded us that, whether we are Muslim or Christian, we both face remarkably similar challenges and possibilities. He began his talk by reminding us that the document had been well received around the world and mentioned that Pope Francis was inspired to write his own encyclical (Fratelli Tutti) on universal fraternity.

The Sheikh talked about our common humanity under God and, how reminding ourselves of our divine source, we should manifest love in our lives and centre on reconciling people, bringing them together. He cited the Holy Qu’ran that even reconciling two people who were alienated from one another was better than one year of fasting and praying - though these two are necessary in our lives as well! If we ignore our common humanity, we will often treat people as animals and not as creatures of God. He cited the Holy Qu’ran that God’s best plan was to create human beings though he gave us free will. Too often, we misuse our divine creation by shedding blood or creating mischief and that is when we forget that we share a common humanity. Unity does not come through the sword but in manifesting God’s love, mercy, and kindness and to work for reconciliation - to bring people together. Sheikh Shomali, who is based in London, ended with a word of admiration for our interfaith efforts in Scotland.

Bishop Brian, fresh from a 13-hour dash by ferry and train from Barra, reminded us of the good that religion can do in the face of many who judge it solely as a divisive force because “we believe in a Creator and the world is not merely a planet but part of Creation, entrusted to us by the Creator. People of faith ought to be more inspired than anyone else.”  He then declared the Document on Human Fraternity as one excellent example of what Faith can offer in terms of its wisdom. He said, “From its very first sentence the document challenges us with the importance of equality in rights, duties, and dignity and seeks to encourage us with the values of goodness, love, and peace.....It has been welcomed by many political and intellectual leaders throughout the world as, in the words of the United Nations’ Secretary General, António Guterres, a ‘model of interfaith harmony and human solidarity’ and an inspiration to ‘renew our commitment to stand together as one human family’”.

Bishop Brian also welcomed the presence of young Muslims and Catholics from schools and universities in the City Chambers to learn about and, above all, put into action the document’s vision not just in a theoretical but practical way which leads to people treating one another with respect, promotes listening to the other person and his or her faith tradition and learning about our similarities of belief. In addition, Bishop Brian emphasised that we should also appreciate our differences and work together to improve life for all, especially the poor and vulnerable.

In the second half of the evening, the participants at round tables discussed the talks and put their thoughts down on paper as to how we could continue to bring people of different faiths together. These have now been typed up and will be distributed to everyone who registered.

Thumbnail Img 0585

As we left the City Chambers, I spoke to some pupils who attended the event from St Roch's Secondary School in Glasgow as they had taken part in interfaith activities during Interfaith Week. They told me they enjoyed the talks and the discussion in groups at the Human Fraternity event and how proud they were of their school’s diversity.Thumbnail Img 0588

The evening concluded with the presentation of lifetime achievement awards to Sr Isabel Smyth SND, former Secretary of the Bishops’ Committee for Interreligious Dialogue, and Azzam Mohammad, Director of the Ahl Al-Beit Society. Both have been involved in interreligious dialogue and action for many years and their interactions have resulted in a close friendship. Congratulations to them both.

Conference 4
Sr Isabel Smyth SND, recipient of the Lifetime Service Award

Dr Duncan MacLaren is the representative of the Archdiocese of Glasgow on the Bishops’ Committee for Interreligious Dialogue.

Pictured in our header image: Duncan MacLaren, Joseph Sikora, Bishop McGee, Azzam Mohamad and Sr. Isabel (presented with awards for lifetime service of interfaith dialogue), Ahmed Khweir and Fr. Charles Coyle.

Human Fraternity Conference in Glasgow Read More »

Interfaith Insights B

Interfaith Insights 2

Anthony Macisaac
Anthony MacIsaac

Welcome to our second “Interfaith Insights” conversation.
Here Anthony MacIsaac is in conversation with fellow Yazidi students…

The Yazidis are an ethno-religious group found in Kurdistan (northern Iraq), Armenia, Georgia, and Iran. Their religion is founded upon ancient beliefs and practices, and was informed by the medieval Sufis, especially by one of their major religious figures: Shaykh Adi ibn Musafir.

Yazidis have been persecuted over the centuries and most recently were targeted by Islamic State (ISIS). As a result, many Yazidis no longer live in their traditional homeland area but now form a diaspora in several countries across the globe.

Dialogue between Anthony MacIsaac and two Yazidis – Kalash Tamoyan, and Samo Bakoyan. Many thanks to the Institut Kurde for helping facilitate this initial dialogue:

Anthony: It’s great to meet with you! Are you from Kurdistan, or elsewhere?
Samo: We are both from Armenia. There are also Yazidis in Georgia.

Kalash: There are 11-13 villages with Yazidis in Armenia, they are concentrated in these areas.

Anthony: I read that Lalash (Kurdistan) is the most sacred place for Yazidis, have you been?
Samo: Of course! We try to go when we can, usually once a year, but the situation with getting the necessary visas is complicated.

Kalash showed us video footage and photographs of Lalash. 

Anthony: So, you go there on pilgrimage? Are there many feasts among the Yazidis?

Samo: Yes. There are three major feasts, and also many others. Of course, we also celebrate our birthdays and our marriages. Marriage is the most important celebration for us, it is something sacred.

With another video, Kalash showed us a traditional Yazidi marriage, in which a green branch must be prepared, symbolising life. This branch is central to the ceremony, without it the marriage cannot be accomplished. 

Anthony: What about initiation? Is there something analogous to Baptism, with Christianity, or to circumcision?
Samo: Initiation is important. There are no ritual requirements for girls, but for boys their hair must be cut ceremonially. This can only be performed by a Shaykh, each family has a Shaykh, who is like their family patriarch.

Kalash: The boys’ hair must be cut at the age of one, we try not to wait longer than that.

Anthony: What happens if you are in the diaspora, and can’t access the Shaykh? I imagine there aren’t many Shaykhs in France?

Samo: That’s right, there aren’t many here. Many live in Lalash, dedicating their lives to prayer, and they are our religious authorities. If they are not here to cut the boys’ hair, for initiation, we cut it ourselves, but we must send it to them in the post.

Anthony: That’s very interesting!

Samo: The Shaykh treats the hair ceremonially, when he receives it, and this validates the initiation of our sons.

Anthony: On the level of belief, how do you understand God and His work? I read that you believe in seven major Angels?

Samo: Yes, there are seven. The most important is Melek Taus.

Anthony: Am I right in thinking he is represented as a peacock?

Samo: This is just representation! It shows his beauty, he is not a bird himself, but angels have wings…

Anthony: The other six angels – what is their function?

Samo: We’d need to ask one of the Shaykhs, our faith is passed on by oral tradition!

Anthony: And God always speaks via Melek Taus, or can God speak in His own ways?

Kalash: Oh yes, God can speak for Himself! But Melek Taus is very important in our faith.

Samo: Melek Taus was with Adam and Eva in the Garden of Eden.

Anthony: What of people? Are the Judeo-Christian Patriarchs and Prophets considered significant by the Yazidis? What of Jesus Christ and Mary?

Samo: They are certainly important, and we have heard their names. There are many stories, which our Shaykhs know better. For us, they are all people of God, but we also venerate Shaykh Adi ibn Musafir, whose tomb is in Lalash.

Anthony: What about Muhammad, as Shaykh Musafir was Sufi? There must be some Islamic influence.

Samo: The simple answer is no, for us Muhammad is not considered one of God’s chosen prophets. We have been very persecuted over the years. In 2015 we suffered from a genocide, and many of our people were kidnapped by Daesh (ISIS). The Ottoman Empire also persecuted our people. Islam and the Yazidis struggle to exist together.

Kalash: But the Christians in Armenia have been excellent to us, they have helped us, and made us very welcome. We live side-by-side, in peace.

Kalash showed us another video, of a new Yazidi place of worship, in Armenia. The building looked impressive, and had seven towers, with the central tower being the largest. On each spire was one of the seven Angels of God. God is known as Xwedê . 

Anthony: What about more spiritual questions? How do you pray? And what do you believe about death and the meaning of life?

Samo: We can pray three times a day (sunrise, noon, sundown) and we usually wash our hands, and our faces before prayer. Life is a mystery, and I can’t say what happens after death! For funeral services, we do pray, and we always insist on burial, never cremation.

Anthony: How do you understand the presence of evil, especially in the context of suffering, which seems to have really affected your own community, tragically?

Samo: It is tragic, but we can’t understand it completely. All is good. We don’t believe in any devil. God is good, the world is good.

Anthony: I suppose the only other thing I was going to ask was whether you have any prohibitions in your religious beliefs?

Samo: Yes, Yazidis can only marry Yazidis. But the Yazidi identity is always passed by the girls – which is why we must initiate the boys by cutting their hair.

Anthony: That parallels with the Jewish belief, of identity passing via the mother?

Samo: Yes, it does! And we don’t eat pork. We do drink alcohol however.

Kalash: In Armenia we like to drink vodka. Sometimes we drink vodka in ritual celebrations, with two hands, and saying a prayer of thanksgiving. In Scotland, you have good whisky?

Anthony: Yes, we do! Thank you so much for your time, and it has been remarkably interesting for me.

Kalash: You must visit Lalash, it is very welcoming to everyone.
Samo: I hope we can meet again, and we can discuss more of your questions. Until next time, and I hope you have a nice Christmas. We celebrate it by giving presents to the children, but we don’t have any religious dimension attached to it.

Interfaith Insights 2 Read More »

Interfaith Learnings

Interfaith Learnings – Sr Isabel Smyth SND

Interfaith Learnings – Sr Isabel Smyth SND

The Scottish Catholic Edition 31 webI have been invited to take part in the monthly faith to faith dialogue organised by Interfaith Glasgow and St Mungo’s Museum of Religious Life and Art. The dialogue will focus on how positive and fruitful interfaith dialogue can enrich one’s own faith and spiritual journey. It’s one that I look forward to. There’s still a suspicion and fear amongst some people of faith that interfaith dialogue will somehow compromise or threaten their own beliefs and practices. For me this has not been the case. I can honestly say that my own faith and spirituality have been enriched and transformed by my work in interreligious dialogue and my contact and friendship with people of other faiths.

My interfaith journey began when I studied world faiths at Lancaster university, met and talked with people of other faiths for the first time in my life and then went on to teach world religions as part of my job in preparing students to teach religious education in Catholic schools at a time when the RE syllabus had moved from being focussed on Christianity to include world religions. This meant trying to give students an insight into the faith of others by explaining some of their beliefs, introducing students to their scriptures, visiting places of worship and encouraging the students to engage in dialogue by visiting the International Flat and taking part in meetings of the Glasgow Sharing of Faiths. To give the students an insight into the wisdom and beauty of a faith I tried to teach it with appreciation and respect, from the ‘inside’ so to speak. Just as a stained-glass window can look quite dull from outside a building but different when seen from inside with the sun lighting up the diverse colours so too another faith can, I would suggest, only be appreciated when we have crossed over, tried to stand in the shoes of another and view it and the world from their perspective. John Dunne, a catholic theologian, sees the work of interreligious dialogue as a crossing over into the world of another and coming back to our own to see it with new eyes. It is this crossing over that brings about a transformation in faith and change of perspective. And along the way I have made many interfaith friends which I greatly value and for which I am very grateful.

So, what have I learned?  I’ve seen my faith from the perspective of another and realised something of its exclusive and oppressive aspects. I was brought up to believe that there was only one truth and that was to be found in the Catholic Church. How wrong we were to think that we were the only way to truth and salvation and that others lived in ignorance of that truth. I have come to recognise, appreciate, and be inspired by the wisdom and truth that I have discovered in other faiths. So too I am glad to say has the Catholic Church. I also appreciate the diversity to be found within faiths. For me this is what makes interfaith relations interesting and challenging because it is very easy sometimes to think that when we use the same words e.g. God or even religion we mean the same thing. We can’t take that for granted. This is where real face to face dialogue happens and it can’t be done quickly. Recently Interfaith Glasgow in partnership with the Council of Christians and Jews produced a report on Difficult Dialogues. It recorded a dialogue that took place over several years, longer than intended because of Covid. I was privileged to be part of that and it was one of the best experiences I’ve had of dialogue because we really listened to one another and honestly shared our common understanding of shared concepts. It also brought out that there is a variety of understandings of people from within one faith and it’s important not to generalise that what one person believes, and thinks is necessarily indicative of what everyone within the faith believes. Interfaith dialogue is a face to face, person to person activity.

Getting to know another faith, experiencing its hospitality and visiting its place of worship is to recognise the sacredness of all faiths. When we encounter a person of another faith we are standing on holy ground, we’re encountering the sacred, the divine in that person and in that tradition. It is indeed a privilege. And sometimes it’s to recognise that another faith might do some things better than our own or its scriptures and teaching lead us to reflect and gain a new insight into our own faith. Krister Stendhal- Ras when he was at Harvard coined the phrase holy envy in urging believers to find beauty in other faiths and there are many things that I admire and could be envious of. But I’ve also come to realise that there are both liberating and oppressive aspects in all faiths and that in interfaith relations it’s important to compare like with like. It’s easy sometimes to compare the best of our own religion with the worst of another or even the worst of our own with the best of another. There is good and bad religion.

Perhaps above all else my interfaith journey has led me to realise that I am a member of a much wider community than my own. I feel in my being that we believers make up a vast community of people who are striving to live a good life and desire the welfare of all sentient beings as well as our planet. I believe that when we each in our own way commit our lives, perhaps our day to following what we believe to be right together we generate a great energy for good, something Christians would call the Kingdom of God, which while hidden is still powerful. Together we are sowing seeds that we hope will grow and flourish, we are in the words attributed to Archbishop Romero prophets of a future not our own.

Interfaith Learnings – Sr Isabel Smyth SND Read More »

Fr4.1 (002)

Interfaith Reception 2023

Friends from Other Faiths Flock to the Eyre Hall in the Curia of the Archdiocese of Glasgow
by Duncan McLaren, Member of the Bishops’ Committee

Members of the Scottish Bishops’ Committee for Interreligious Dialogue were delighted with the turnout of faith leaders on 28th September.

This was our first Interfaith Reception since the Covid pandemic which stopped the annual meeting from taking place for three years.

Over 60 leaders from communities representing the major faiths as well as friends from the other Churches, local politicians and the Director of Interfaith Scotland were welcomed by the new Interfaith Officer, Joe Sikora. He was standing in for the President, Bishop Brian McGee, who had to go to Belfast due to a family bereavement.

FR5 (002)The guests enjoyed a talk by Sr Isabel Smyth SND, the former Secretary of the Committee and a renowned and well-loved promoter of interfaith dialogue in Scotland. She reflected on what she had learned over three decades about interreligious dialogue and talked about how her interaction with other faiths led not only to knowledge about them but how it transformed and increased her own faith. She focused on four things.

Firstly, on the need for gratitude. Gratitude for the wisdom and insight gained from the faith of others, for the widening of her perspective so that my notion of God, faith has expanded beyond what it was in my own tradition, and for the friendships of many of the people she has encountered over the years.

Secondly, she reflected on the need to “honour the pain” that has marked the chequered history of religious encounters, including the exclusive and oppressive aspects of her own religion, and a long-held belief that the Catholic faith contained the only truth and others lived in ignorance.

She also reflected how interfaith dialogue had given her the ability to see things “with new eyes”.  In particular the diversity found within faiths which makes interreligious dialogue so interesting and challenging.

Finally, Sr. Isabel reflected on the way forward or “going forth”, as collaborators in a vast project to make the world a better place for everyone to live in justice and peace.

Everyone was relieved to meet up again which could be heard in the conversations, the laughter and the invitations given out so freely. Over a simple meal, the atmosphere was one of genuine dialogue, made all the easier because of the friendships forged previously.

A Shia Muslim guest commented: I always enjoyed coming here and used to meet with the late Archbishop Mario Conti.  We became good friends!”.  A Hindu lady who never missed this event in the past said she felt “very much at home as usual”.

It is an occasion such as this that reminds us we are all building, through our interfaith work, peaceful communities which spread that message of living in harmony together throughout society.

Interfaith Reception 2023 Read More »

Interfaith Insights B

Interfaith Insights 1

Anthony Macisaac
Anthony MacIsaac

Welcome to our first “Interfaith Insights” conversation. Over the coming weeks Anthony MacIsaac will have conversations with fellow students of different faiths.

Catholic Theology Student Anthony MacIsaac interviews fellow students of other faiths.

Interview 1 Abigaëlle Chalom – Jewish student

Anthony: Hello Abigaelle, thanks for agreeing to discuss some elements of your faith with me. It’s good to have the chance to talk about your faith and theology. To begin with let me ask… Is belief in God important for you? What is God in your opinion? I know that is a big question to start off with!

Abigaëlle: Belief just isn’t Jewish core material. God is self-evident, the very starting point of any thought, sensation, emotion or perception. It’s in the very Name, the Tetragrammaton,(YHWH) which is related to the verb “to be”. So if something “is”, it’s God, period. So, believing or not believing isn’t really the question, ever. Life, and how to conduct one’s life, that’s the central matter of Judaism, to me. Furthermore, by definition, no person could embrace God’s point-of-view, so to speak. This means that God isn’t a theory or an addition of principles. Instead, God is the very essence of being. For us, being is not only mere action, but also questioning our own acts and motivations, our desires and needs. Not once and for all, not when so inclined, but as a way of life.

Anthony: What impact does Scripture have on your faith?

Abigaëlle: Since Judaism is not dependent on faith, as far as I am concerned, the Scriptures impact me as would a machine that could travel in Space and Time. Scriptures are a millennia-old writing process, enacted through so many civilisations – all of them born, all of them grown, and all of them eventually lost – sharing the tales of God’s unending diversity, and at the same time God’s breath of constancy.

Anthony: Do you consider Scripture as literature, or as something more?

Abigaëlle: I consider the Scriptures as a powerful generator of symbolism, and as one of the oldest relays of one simple but essential fact, life is hard and confusing, it has been, it will be. Beyond literature, it is the most ancient testimony of our shared struggle and responsibility.

Anthony: What about rituals? Are these important for you?

Abigaëlle: I do believe rituals are at the essence of Judaism, creating a bridge between spirituality and life. Like bridges, we must worry if everybody walks on them at the same pace, and all at the same time, for the bridge will collapse. A Jew remains a Jew, but his identity in Judaism intrinsically demands that he question everything about Judaism. Some Jews will study exclusively, some will maintain a few traditions, some will do both, there are as many variations of Judaism as there are Jews, even an Jewish atheist is still Jewish.

Anthony: In Catholicism, we have the Sacraments. These are centred on worshipping God, but also on our relationship with God. They tend to touch each person emotionally, as they associate all of this with music, art, and even theatre. Do the rituals of Judaism have a similar impact? Do they touch the individual in the same way?

Abigaëlle: I think they do in a way that has been progressively enhanced by successive diasporas. First things first, Judaism excludes images of God, this extends to a complex definition of idolatry. As we said before, God is “to be” but experiencing being – this is human. The depiction of God’s interactions with humanity has always been focused on the human point-of-view in the Jewish Scriptures, and the Jewish arts play with that limitation.

Anthony: Perhaps we can also talk about prayer? One form of prayer is contemplation. In the Church, this is often accomplished by asceticism, the monastic life, and even hermitage. This can also be achieved to a degree in the ordinary devotion of a life well-lived. Is contemplation important for you?

Abigaëlle: Judaic prayer tends to put each thing in its place, to actively celebrate life. Even the austere aspect of some Jewish Orthodox communities contains a constant flow of feasts and celebrations squared by prayer as a conscious rest and focus. So, as a consequence of having no proper eschatology (theology concerned with death, judgment, and the final destiny of the soul and of humankind), Judaism does not seem really “contemplative” to me.

Anthony: As I understand more traditional forms of Judaism, I thought there was some eschatology, even if not well defined. Within the Kabbalah, is there not the idea of Tikkun Olam, that is of repairing and restoring the world to what it should be? Is there not also a world to come in Jewish prayer?

Abigaëlle: One of the most structural ideas in Judaism revolves around the end of times as an undefined and undefinable perspective. The end of time marks a partition between the Olam Hazeh and the Olam Haba – Olam Haba as the continuous here and now, the strictly absolute future. Since potential and realisation are mutually exclusive, human expectations are paradoxical, as shown in the few pages of the Talmud’s Sanhedrin that debate these issues. To act or to wait is the messianic question with the most discrepancy in Judaism.

Moreover, since the end of time is an absolute, nothing is to be humanly said about it and the very question of trying to put a date on it is rejected: “let their breath be taken away, those who try calculating the end of time” say the masters. However, those masters had to manage expectations raised by fears and hopes. To this end, the Talmud refers to the “messianic time”, as a transitional era between our world and the one to come, an era we can discuss to drive our expectations forward. During this era, changes are to occur, but once more, nothing can legitimately be said about the world that is to come because it is within God’s plan and as such, an absolute.

“All the prophets, without exception, prophesied only for the messianic times, but as for the world to come, the reward is not quantifiable, as it states: no eye has seen it except You, Elohim, who will act for him who awaits You.” (Sanhedrin) 

As to Tikkun Olam, I understand it as a goal to target, but not to reach. To me, the idea of a perfect world or a perfect experience is contradictory with humanity. Instead, it is God’s field of existence, while ours is relative, complex and imperfect.

Interfaith Insights 1 Read More »

Original 87119bf7 5891 48e3 Aa97 Bf474e9b0ea3 Pxl 20230420 192630444.mp

Demonstration Passover Seder

By Joseph Sikora, Secretary for Interreligious Dialogue

In April, Duncan MacLaren and myself attended the demonstration Passover Seder at the Glasgow Reform Synagogue in Newton Mearns.

Lead by Rabbi Pete Tobias, we were, along with a number of other guests representing various faith traditions and local civic society, taken through the rich symbolism and meaning of the Seder.

As a teacher of Religious Education for 30 years, I had often taught my students about the story of the Exodus and Passover but every day is a school day and I learned so much just from being with Jewish community and Rabbi Tobias.

The celebration of the Seder itself is based on one simple line from the Torah “And you shall tell your children on that day ‘This is what the Eternal One did for me when bringing me out of Egypt’”. In this short verse we find two of the most important elements of the Seder.

Firstly, that it is meant to be told to Jewish children by their parents so that they understand the importance of the that led to their ancestors being freed from slavery and secondly, that the struggle for freedom continues and that it is a responsibility for every generation of Jews.

With insight and humour Rabbi Tobias, ably assisted by members of the synagogue at the various tables, took us through the symbolism of the various food that are found on the Seder plate, the somewhat odd custom of leaning to the left to drink the cups of wine, and the various ‘tricks’ that are used to keep the children focused on the meaning of the celebration and the important messages that the Seder holds for the whole community.

A truly joyful occasion somewhat bizarrely rounded off with the singing of a song about the Matzah unleavened bread to the tune of Mama Mia. I didn’t see that one coming.

A grateful thanks to the community of the Glasgow Reform Synagogue for the invitation and a lovely evening.

The photograph above shows Rabbi Pete Tobias extreme right talking to some of the guests. Duncan can be seen at the rear centre of the photo and Joseph is to the left, back to the camera.

Demonstration Passover Seder Read More »

Jumpstory Download20230522 162434

Scottish faith leaders speak out against assisted suicide

On Thursday 18th May Bishop John Keenan, Bishop of Paisley and Vice-President of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland, joined the Rt Rev Iain Greenshields, Moderator of the Church of Scotland and Imam Shaykh Hamza Khandwalla, Imam of Dundee Central Mosque, at the Scottish Parliament to sign a statement urging MSPs to vote down a proposal to legalise assisted suicide in Scotland.

The joint statement expresses “deep concern” that assisted suicide “inevitably undermines the dignity of the human person” and that it could “put pressure on vulnerable individuals to opt for assisted suicide.”

The statement ends with a firm commitment by the Church of Scotland, Roman Catholic Church, and the Scottish Association of Mosques to oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Bishop John Keenan said: “Assisted suicide attacks human dignity and results in human life being increasingly valued on the basis of its efficiency and utility. Implicit in legal assisted suicide is that an individual can lose their value and worth.

“Evidence from countries where assisted suicide or euthanasia is legal shows that vulnerable people feel pressured to end their lives through fear of being a burden. In such situations the option of assisted suicide is less about having a ‘right’ to die and more about feeling the full weight and expectation of a duty to die.

“When vulnerable people, including the elderly and poor, express concerns about being a burden, the appropriate response is not to suggest that they have a duty to die; rather, it is to commit to meeting their needs and providing the care and compassion they need to help them live.”

Later this year Liam McArthur MSP is expected to present a bill before the Scottish Parliament proposing the legalisation of assisted suicide.

In their Joint statement the faith leaders said: “On behalf of the faith communities we represent, we wish to express our deep concern about the proposed Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, which will shortly be considered by the Scottish Parliament.  Our faith traditions are united in the principle that assisted dying in itself inevitably undermines the dignity of the human person, and to allow it would mean that our society as a whole loses its common humanity.”

“The ways in which similar laws in other countries are being applied, and the effect that its introduction would have on some of the most vulnerable in our society, including the disabled and the elderly, would be extremely detrimental.” The statement ends with a call to “Members of the Scottish Parliament to consider carefully the implications of this Bill, to express their concerns, and to vote against it.”

Keenan-John-Bishop-1
Bishop John Keenan

Moderator-Designate-Rev-Dr-Iain-Greenshields
Rt Rev Iain Greenshields

Hamza-Khandwallah
Imam Shaykh Hamza Khandwalla

 

Scottish faith leaders speak out against assisted suicide Read More »

Logo En International Day Of Human Fraternity 1

International Human Fraternity Day

A report on our Conference marking International Human Fraternity Day, by Joseph Sikora

In February we marked International Human Fraternity Day, celebrating the signing of the Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together by Pope Francis and the Grand Imam from Al-Azhar University, Ahmed el-Tayeb in 2019.   The document led to the setting up of the Higher Committee on Human Fraternity, composed of Christians, Muslims and Jews and was instituted to promote human fraternity values in communities around the world.

Held in the Archdiocesan Offices in Glasgow, the event was hosted by Bishop Brian McGee, who heads the Committee for Interreligious Dialogue and facilitated by Brett Nichols. Brett is a Christian and is interested in all religions and how they influence the way we think, live and care for each other. He has worked with the Craighead Institute as well as serving on its Board.

This year we invited three members of the planning group, Duncan Maclaren, Ahmed Khweir and Sr. Isabel Smyth, to say three things that stood out for them in the document.

Duncan
Duncan MacLaren

Duncan MacLaren began by noting that the Document tells me about how we should see one another- Christian and Muslim. “Faith leads a believer to see in the other a brother or sister to be supported and loved”. A move away from self-centredness to other-centredness, then act to improve the lot of the Other – orthopraxis (correct acting) over orthodoxy (correct thinking). In practical terms he argues this means “we in the Christian community must call out the casual racism that so many people of this peely-wally colour seem to think it’s their privilege to indulge in.” He concluded his observations by highlighting that, “we must take seriously in our lives the option for the poor and marginalised, reacting against those who believe desperate people fleeing persecution or poverty in boats should be sent to Rwanda or pushed back to sea. And we must show pride, not just tolerance, in having ‘New Scots’ in this country which we share and who enrich us all in so many ways.”

Ahmed
Ahmed Khweir

Ahmed Khweir reminded us all that, “dialogue isn’t just about exchanging pleasantries, it is actually about getting to know someone and seeing something from their perspective and actually understanding it from their perspective.” A culture of dialogue he pointed out “is seeing your brother and sister striving for peace and wanting to be part of it. Is seeing your brother and sister striving for justice and wanting to be part of it. Is seeing your brother and sister seek the beauty of God’s creation and wanting to share and reflect it.” In conclusion he said: The human being is created from the unity of God and our challenge is to show unity in God both spiritually and rationally.”

Sr. Isabel stressed that the document encourages the adoption of a culture of dialogue while avoiding unproductive discussions.  She said: “I do believe that interfaith dialogue is a worthwhile activity in itself. But I sometimes wonder if those of us who are engaged in interfaith issues sometimes find ourselves in dialogue about matters in which we have no expertise just because we are interfaith activists.

Sr. Isabel and B Brain
Sr Isabel Smyth, Bishop Brian McGee

“What we want is that social action, justice and peace groups develop an interfaith approach to their work, working alongside others interested in the same things from different faiths and none.  This is what Jonathan Sacks called ‘side by side’ engagement and the focus is on the issue.”

She concluded by asking the audience, “Do we have a special and unique contribution to make, not just to mutual understanding and respect but also to social issues?”

This was followed by three open questions:

The challenges in society that particularly concern me as a person of faith are…

The challenges facing interfaith relations are…

As a person of faith and someone interested in inter-religious dialogue, the ways in which we can foster fraternity and help us live well together are…

This led to lively discussion and there was much to ponder and consider. It was important to reflect a little on the nature of interfaith relations and the place of interreligious dialogue within that. The two are not the same thing.

The feedback from the groups of course showed a great variety of responses, including the importance of working together on issues such as climate change but also the need to understand and value the religion and cultural heritage of others and the ability to dialogue with each other with humility and a willingness to learn from another’s religion in a way that will enrich our own faith tradition and take us out of our comfort zone. There was still a call for education about other faiths – “we lack understanding of the other, we need more dialogue. This will add to respect for each other and overcome being prejudiced about other religions”. 

The Human Fraternity document, which was signed in the name of God and suffering humanity, covers a broad sweep of social issues which is something that we have come to expect from Pope Francis. It is truly aspirational and envisions a world free of poverty, violence, injustice, and inequality, and recognises the importance of faiths working together to establish this.

International Human Fraternity Day Read More »

Scroll to Top